This article by Dr Les Sachs (Dr Leslie Sachs)
published on the "Banned in America" weblog, and on other locations on
the internet, on 15 April 2006. Recently this was yet another article
banned by US illegal court orders against Google
that were requested by President Bush's friend, the racist and
terrorist author Patricia
These allegations about Wikpedia as a tool of CIA and US criminal
corporations, announced long ago to the world by Dr Sachs, are now even
more fully PROVEN by new large-scale research announced by Wired News,
and also on Alex Jones' Prison Planet website.
For the article, "Credibility
Wikipedia Takes a Dive . . .Online encyclopedia outed as bias tool
of intelligence agencies, corporations," by Paul Joseph Watson on
Alex Jones' Prison Planet website, click
For the article "See
Editing Wikipedia" by John Borland on Wired News, click
(See also the article
about Bush's friend: Patricia
Wikipedia & Answers.com as base to
deceive media, plant false information to cover Cornwell felony crimes
Wikipedia An Ultimate
Trojan Horse for CIA and US Government on the Internet -
Fake Wikipedia Biography of Bush Donor Patricia Cornwell
Absurd Wikipedia "Budget" - the Giveaway of CIA-NSA Funding?
of the Wikipedia online "encyclopedia" - now one of the most dominant
media websites in the entire world - show signs of being CIA-type
operatives, directly engaged in US-funded propaganda operations against
US and world citizens.
This has significance far beyond the particular
instance here of false statements and propaganda, that have been
maintained on Wikipedia in order to cover for a wealthy donor to the
President George Bush family, to try to sabotage American legal
reform and to attack a critic of the US empire.
What we are facing, is
that Wikipedia may already be the ultimate Trojan horse of US
government propaganda and intelligence operations. Via this one
dominant website, the thousands of nameless agents at CIA and NSA
headquarters, can now deceive and defraud millions of US citizens and
much of the rest of the world as well.
These agents can smear and
attack those who challenge the government; they can easily launch lies
and propaganda on this powerful web forum that can falsify anything,
undermine almost anyone.
To give you a quick proof of how fake
Wikipedia is, let's consider the case of major Bush donor and weird
right-wing celebrity author Patricia Cornwell.
is an old pal
of the Bushes since the early 1980s.
Take a look on the web for the well-documented "Patricia
Biography: Her Crimes, Bribery, Scandals and Mental Illness".
Here you find a pretty juicy set of legal cases and scandals collected
from court documents and print media like Esquire and Vanity Fair.
take a look at the totally fake biography of Bush's friend Cornwell on
Wikipedia - Here, most of the facts of Cornwell's fascinating life are
not even mentioned, and a good chunk of the Wikipedia entry makes a
slanderous attack on the author who wrote Cornwell's real biography
At the time this article was originally written, the Wikipedia attack
biographer used a fake "internet source" for a phony story about a
court case, not telling you that this deceptive Wikipedia "source
article" is from a dishonest law professor, Roy Girasa, working for
Cornwell's own publisher, Pearson plc Penguin Books, who is a party in
case being described.
The American CIA and intelligence guys are very
interested in Bush's friend Cornwell, and not because they like her
books (which federal judge Robert Payne once colourfully described as
"a load of
crap"). The CIA guys want to hide the truth about Cornwell, and to
smear any critics, because the things Cornwell has done with US judges,
are a scandal with the potential to rock the US government to its
foundations. The Cornwell entry has become a good example of how
Wikipedia has become a US government propaganda mechanism.
all the lies and fraud on Wikipedia, this bogus online "encyclopedia"
is today the most dominant reference source in the English speaking
world. It is far more influential than many people realize or imagine,
thanks to the power of the internet.
Wikipedia is based in
Florida, where President Bush's brother Jeb has been Governor, and
where the Bushes managed that nice little game in 2000 that led to
America's judges making G. W. Bush the President, even though the other
guy won the election. The rise and growth of Wikipedia is simultaneous
with the current Bush regime.
Here's another quick way to give
you an idea what is going on. Think of some country you know very
little about. Punch up the name on an internet search engine. Two
things will tend to pop up quite high on the list: "Wikipedia" and the
"CIA Fact Book". Hmm. Are you starting to feel the connections here?
its own boasting, Wikipedia is one of the most consulted websites on
the planet. But the content of Wikipedia - and any lies or fraud or
propaganda in that content - are multiplied many times over, because
Wikipedia in turn becomes the source for millions of other web viewings
under many other names, under all a number of Wikipedia licence
agreements or other kinds of borrowing.
Particularly important is the US-Israeli Answers.com site, which
multiplies and magnifies whatever lies are in
Wikipedia content. The CIA loves it - all that free slander and
propaganda, multiplied over and over. Answers.com - based in Jerusalem
and New York - does not even try to deny that it is servicing the US
and Israeli intelligence agencies.
So when you do an internet search, often what you find among your "Top
10" search results, are several results from Wikipedia, and then
several results from Answers.com (which basically repeat Wikipedia).
Most people will never get beyond these entries, and thus the US
intelligence and propaganda agencies already control what many people
read on the internet.
In this particular case of Patricia Cornwell,
who acts like a CIA-backed operative is one "W. Guy Finley",
who operates on Wikipedia as one of the central Wikipedia "Advocates",
or Wikipedia pseudo-lawyers -
the people who are supposed to help you, when someone else is
publishing false things about you.
lawyers" in that strange little Wikipedia world, turn out to be as
nasty, devious and malicious as other lawyers in the US who serve the
corporations and the US government.
W. Guy Finley is one of two leading Wikipedia administrators, along
with British Wikipedia spokesman David Gerard, who have e-mailed their
hatred and abuse to Dr Les Sachs
for daring to criticise Wikipedia and expose its fraud and service to
the US regime. Finley and Gerard both express their deep hatred, and
their wish to do harm to Dr Les Sachs, and they have the powerful
Wikipedia tool in their hands to help slander and attack him.
These "Wikipedia advocates", like everybody else on Wikipedia, kiss up
to the rich and
the powerful corporate criminals and US government, who are ultimately
served by the fraudulent Bush-backed Wikipedia.
The fake Wikipedia "democracy"
like the United States itself, Wikipedia pretends to be a "democracy".
They proudly trumpet: "Anyone can edit Wikipedia!" And something like
that happens, but it is an illusion. You can likely right now jump onto
the computer, go to the Patricia Cornwell page, and put in a few real
facts about the life of Bush's friend Patricia Cornwell, and delete
some of the lies put there by Cornwell's staff or the CIA guys.
then - you know what happens a little later? Cornwell's staff members
(she has over 125 million dollars, she can afford them) or the CIA
guys, quickly delete your material and put things back the way they
were, unless you said something really ass-kissy that they like and
want to keep.
Much like America itself, the fake "Wikipedia"
democracy, turns out to be rule by the rich and the strong and the
devious. Some of it is sheer manpower - Other things being equal,
Wikipedia articles tend to be controlled by those who have the time and
staff to maintain the pages the way they want.
And no one has
more staff available, than wealthy political criminals, or the several
US intelligence agencies, with
their multi-billion dollar propaganda budget, who can afford to have
thousands of employees at secret, anonymous locations, trolling
Wikipedia to keep things up the way the government wants.
When the US intelligence agencies, and a wealthy political criminal
like Patricia Cornwell are working together, they exercise a complete
Nazi-like control over Wikipedia.
are conflicts handled on Wikipedia, when several people keep editing a
page, when it's you in conflict with the CIA guys? It's a complex
question of procedure combined with bullying. Wikipedia works like a
cult. There are lots of bizarre little rules or "Wikiquette", some of
them self-contradictory. Only the remote Lords of Wikipedia are really
masters of the system, and this is all to benefit the rich and powerful
and the US government.
are various conflict-resolution procedures, and there are sets and
hierarchies of Wikipedia "administrators" and "volunteers" who often
hide behind screen names. It is an extremely hidden process, and they
make it very difficult to contact the leaders, or to find out how the
place works or what is going on. People involved in Wikipedia are a
of some naive volunteers and eager beavers, who don't realize they're
part of a very sleazy government operation, and a likely quite large
coterie of operatives at intelligence agencies like the CIA and NSA,
who may be the truly powerful "Wikipedia volunteers", working with the
corporate criminal hirelings such as work for Patricia Cornwell.
mean that most of Wikipedia is written by the government, or supervised
by it? No, not at all. A lot of Wikipedia, most of it in fact, the CIA
guys don't care about. For articles about pottery in 7th century
France, or ancient geology in the time of the dinosaurs, the Lords of
Wikipedia are perfectly happy to let college professors, hobbyists or
just plain average people put up material and bicker about it. The vast
majority of Wikipedia content falls into this category.
it was part of the genius of Wikipedia that they could enroll millions
of people in helping to create this CIA-backed vehicle. It is much more
powerful and legitimate-seeming, if people get used to looking things
up on Wikipedia, if they go there to read helpful things about
Beethoven or Tibetan rugs. The somewhat legitimate content, makes it
much easier to sell the propaganda placed there in specific CIA-backed
cases, like with Bush's friend and donor Patricia Cornwell.
power also derives from the short attention span and laziness of the
average person. To get an impression of something or someone, people
jump on the internet and google or search. Then, for their quick
initial view of a person or topic, they often jump onto Wikipedia. If
Wikipedia smears someone, that person is pretty well smeared, factual
or not, and people usually will not investigate any further.
Wikipedia is also the direct tool for controlling the world's corporate
media employees - the so-called "journalists" - who base their articles
now, largely on what they themselves read on Wikipedia, and then they
pompously intone, "According to Wikipedia . . . ", as if it were
somehow very clever of these "journalists" to consult Wikipedia at the
top of their Google-search.
Journalists instinctively feel, that
Wikipedia is the tool of the US government and the big corporations,
and thus that they can follow Wikipedia whenever a Wikipedia article is
supporting the US-corporate establishment.
The journalists then publish shoddy, corrupt and outright false "news
articles", which are based on Wikipedia as a source, and then Wikipedia
can then use these "major news media" articles as new "authentic
sources" for Wikipedia. It is a perfect circle of propaganda
corruption, managed by the US intelligence agencies. Wikipedia is the
dream of Nazi propaganda minister Joseph Goebbels come true. -
Worldwide control of what people read and think, via one website under
US government control.
For more about this kind of Wikipedia-and-news-media propaganda circle
of propaganda and lies in a specific case, see the article Patricia
Wikipedia & Answers.com as base to
deceive media, plant false information to cover Cornwell felony crimes
Fake "Moderation" and "Neutrality"
gives way to a feigned moderation in cases of accepted public
"controversy", like with articles about President Ronald Reagan or
President Bill Clinton. Such famous people have "differing views"
them in the major media, and lots of people try to add material. So the
Lords of Wikipedia move the page to a sort of "neutral compromise" of
"well established" material. It's not that you get the real truth, of
course. What you get is a neutral mish-mash of facts as allowed by the
major corporate media. Not too bad perhaps, but often not very
If criminals are being publicly charged
and indicted, if the corporate media has made a big story over the
indicted executives of Enron, or some lobbyist facing federal charges,
Wikipedia will always tend to go along with the big corporate media.
But that's not where the deep trouble with Wikipedia lies.
problem of course is that Wikipedia will tend to ban and suppress some
key information, on the grounds that it is controversial and not
"neutral". The Lords of Wikipedia are "neutral" when they want to be,
at other times they are glad to engage in libel and slander and fraud,
and then they call that "neutral" too.
A real grave danger of
Wikipedia - and very obvious evil of it - comes out with regard to the
"U" class of political criminals in America. These are government or
corporate criminals who have political connections, but are so far
Un-indicted, Un-investigated and Un-known to be criminals, thanks to a
cover up by America's mainstream media.
Bush's friend the author
Patricia Cornwell, is exactly this kind of class "U" criminal.
know her name, they know she sells lots books, but most of the public
knows very little about her, despite the fact that her crimes and
scandals and sleazy behavior are nearly all in the public record.
Cornwell funds President Bush and the US politicians with millions of
dollars, has successfully bribed federal judges, and she is good
friends with US
government agents, and the reward for her gifts is that the media won't
report on what happens with her. The big corporate media are in
collusion with the US government or Cornwell's publishing company,
Pearson - Penguin, and
the small media are afraid they will get nailed by bribed US judges.
the media don't talk about how Cornwell and her lesbian lover Irene
Shulgin were frolicking at Kennebunkport with the current President
Bush, and how Cornwell gave the Bush family a $1 million gift then,
handing the money to the President's mother, Barbara Bush (the wife of
the previous President Bush). The media know that story, they have a
witness, but they don't tell. That's because the government wants to
deceive all those starry-eyed Christian voters, who might not have
thought so well of Bush or Cornwell, thinking about that lesbian
romping and the money flowing, all on the Bush family estate.
to what you might guess about celebrities, the media will indeed hide
many things about celebrities who have good political connections. If
the government is not prosecuting them, and they are truly politically
connected, like Patricia Cornwell, the media will join a cover-up of
view of reality in the US and is much of the world
is shaped by a small handful of media corporations,
whose ownership is intermixed with the other large multi-national
corporations who control much of the world economy. This control is
effective. Most of the stories you would want to hear, do not make it
onto CNN. You need to dig, and dig deep, on the internet, to really
know what is happening in the world.
And that goes triple for
any crimes connected to the US judges and courts and lawyers. No
subject is more taboo in the United States, than the crooked US legal
so many innocent people get sentenced to prison or have their rights
taken away, how people everywhere in America are robbed and betrayed by
judges and lawyers and the system. These topics are all taboo, very
cover-up of America's phony legal system, is one of the most central
Big Lies about the US. That cover-up is a priority for US intelligence
agencies, hence the CIA and other US agency interest in covering up for
Even in public records, the US is spending about 45 billion dollars on
intelligence and propaganda. That is more than enough to give a salary
to thousands of phoney Wikipedia "volunteers" who are really employees
of the US intelligence agencies.
Given the importance of Wikipedia now as the central tool of worldwide
propaganda, it is simply irresistable to the US rulers to spend this
money on Wikipedia, the most successful government propaganda operation
in the history of the world.
It goes far beyond the desire merely to cover-up for
Bush, though there is plenty of that impulse in the CIA and
intelligence agencies, where the Bushes have held sway ever since
George H. W. Bush was CIA Director several decades ago.
intelligence agencies know that to maintain the world image of America
as a "democracy", it is important that most people of the world, and
the US citizens
who haven't yet been victims, never know the truth about the crooked
and bribed US judges.
The CIA wants to help make sure that people don't
think about the big corporations controlling the courts, and how
America's gulag of 2.2 million prisoners is actually the biggest slave
labour program since Joe Stalin and Adolf Hitler. - One out of every 45
working-age US adult males is already in prison (i.e., not counting
children or the elderly), and the US government and its CIA want to
make very sure the world is not thinking too much about this fact.
And to cover up
for the legal system, the CIA and US-Bush regime need to cover up for
Bush's friend Patricia
Cornwell. As part of the 2000 election campaign for Bush, Cornwell
bought a fake court proceeding with a US federal judge to ban this
writer's freedom of speech. This "show trial" was so fake it is almost
hilarious, with the proof of federal crime lying around in broad
The federal judge bribed by Cornwell, Robert Payne,
was appointed by
Cornwell's friend the first President Bush. The judge then picked his
own friends to pose as the lawyers of the victim, and as part of the
fake trial they invented a fake "Freedom Works Foundation", a so-called
"first amendment civil rights charity foundation" that did not exist at
all. The judge and his friends put this Cornwell-funded fraud in
writing, in court documents and on the internet.
With this fake
trial, they banned this writer's freedom of speech, thinking they would
make him silent about Cornwell and Bush and about the fake trial. Now,
however, they realize they should have killed the writer instead.
the writer is safe in Europe, a political refugee from the US
government, writing articles like the one you are reading right now,
exposing the fraud of the US legal system.
It is all so important that in 2007, the US regime conducted another
fake trial against Dr Les Sachs, in order to generate corporate media
articles slandering him, and to try and use Google to again ban his
writings from the internet. You are reading one of these US-banned
articles right now.
If these crimes were genuinely exposed by an
independent world media (ha!), Patricia Cornwell would be indicted for
these crimes involving US
courts and judges, but the US corporate media will side with Cornwell
unless the government moves first. And the government won't move unless
the media moves.
And it's the job of the CIA and Wikipedia, to
help try and make sure the public doesn't know the real truth about
Cornwell and her
crimes. The CIA and Wikipedia would like to smear and slander this
writer who is Cornwell's target victim, to try to stop people from
reading my words, to try and prevent me from becoming better known and
more effective as
a critic of the corrupt US empire.
The plight of Wikipedia victims
you get victimized on Wikipedia as a political target by well-connected
crooks, you quickly find out how hard it is to do anything or contact
anybody on Wikipedia, how difficult it is to get any redress. Your
complaints are often just ignored, as they get passed around to the
CIA-type-guys who really control Wikipedia.
And unlike the
genteel controversies on Wikipedia, where they have a dispute between
two college professors who are writing about baroque music, you find
they quickly get nasty and venomous and slanderous about you, if you
a political target like Dr Les Sachs. The Wikipedia goons do their best
to create an
image of you as someone who is self-interested, a rule-breaker, a
destructive vandal, someone not using good "Wikiquette".
the crooks and goons and CIA guys on Wikipedia all pat each other on
the back and congratulate each other, for being fellow Wikipedia people
You can momentarily change the false material they
written about you, but the Wikipedia goons just change it back, and
quickly start charging you with "vandalising" Wikipedia.
all sorts of tricks they use to make it hard for you to make any
complaint. There's a Wikipedia "rule" against threatening people with
legal action. So they allow wealthy criminals to slander you and tell
lies about you, but if you talk about their legal liability - Whoa!
They start to jump in and condemn you, for violating the Wikipedia rule
of mentioning the law.
They even make it hard for you to figure
out where to complain. For a while on Wikipedia, they have had one spot
that tells you, if you've been
a victim of libel, to contact the "help desk" - but there's no link
to the help desk e-mail address, or any clear way to find it.
When you go to
places you think you might make a complaint, you suddenly find there is
a rule posted about how this is the wrong kind of place, you shouldn't
post complaints here - but still no indication of where to go.
Wikipedia, when you do make complaints, they basically end up getting
reviewed by the same people who are putting up the false material about
you in the first place. It is just like in the American legal system,
complaints about judges get smothered by the judges themselves, so the
same judges involved in committing crimes, also get to dismiss your
find that the people on Wikipedia, reflect the power realities and
corruption of American society generally. The Wikipedia "volunteers",
whether they are CIA guys, or regular idiots who are part of the cult
of Wikipedia, or staff members for political criminals like Patricia
Cornwell, all kiss up to the power structure, which they can easily
see by (1) whether you are contacting them yourself, or whether a
powerful lawyer is doing so for you; and (2) what else they can find
out about you by googling your name.
If you are well-connected,
rich, powerful, Wikipedia will instantly adjust things for you. If they
feel they can ignore and abuse you, even the little dumb Wikipedia
volunteers tend to follow the lead of the mighty unseen Lords of
Wikipedia, and they will ignore you and sneer with contempt at you, and
even send you e-mails with their abuse and hatred (see more about that
also offers the "Wikipedia advocates" who are supposed to "represent"
you, but these can be guys like W. Guy Finley of 'Dynascope' - a name
similar to other CIA front-company names. Finley acts like an employee
CIA-backed intelligence agency contractor, there to deflect and ignore
what you have to say. With regard to complaints about the libel and
slander against Cornwell's biographer on the Patricia Cornwell page,
Finley's response was the laughable suggestion that the victim try and
contact film maker Michael Moore to get the Cornwell scandal exposed
first, before Wikipedia would do anything about the false smears and
The Wikipedia guy's message was clear - if the big
corporate media will get involved, then Wikipedia will play along.
Otherwise, Wikipedia will continue with false information and
slandering, the way the CIA would play it.
In the Patricia
Cornwell page attacking Cornwell's biographer, they long linked to an
"online reference source" for the Cornwell slandering, a false and
deceptive article by a Pace University law professor, Rosario or also
Roy John Girasa, writing under contract for Pearson - Penguin,
Cornwell's own publisher, which has been named in a
court filing with US
judges as a partner in Cornwell's crimes and in the very legal
Girasa was describing.
Needless to say, the Wikipedia
slandering did not disclose the conflict of interest in citing this
Cornwell "source" that is both Cornwell's publisher, and also a named
party along with Cornwell in the same legal case as is being described.
Wikipedia - a bogus organization and budget
of the most powerful and dominant media organizations in the world
today, the stated budget and organizational description of Wikipedia
that you find, is laughably preposterous. Really quite absurd.
much of America's CIA-backed operations since the 1970s, Wikipedia does
its work under the friendly face of a "non-profit foundation". As you
browse the online Wikipedia documents about itself, you realize how
bizarre and unlikely is the picture they are painting for you.
is this enormous media organization, with over a million separate web
pages, being accessed constantly and at immense volume around the
world, and printing huge amounts of controversial material which raise
continual legal questions, and having an enormous management apparatus
But then you see the numbers. Just two full-time
employees, it says in a description of a center node of the Wikipedia
empire. Two? Yup, that's all. There's an annual budget of about one -
just one - million dollars. And much of that for equipment, it says.
they present for a legal budget, would not even pay for one lawyer to
just read the e-mails about all the legal issues that arise out of
is a tiny board of directors, looking as if it were a collection of
hippie-type personalities. The rest are all "volunteers".
right. "Volunteers" by the thousands, joining in a very complex
management scheme, and somehow this whole giant worldwide propaganda
machine is running, a machine which somehow never seems to have many
expenses except for a few fancy pieces of computer gear.
seems as if the CIA really over-did it with this particular fake front
of Wikipedia "budget" and "organization". The storefront is too tiny to
really be connected with the elephantine operation behind it.
way that you can see that Wikipedia has government backing, is that
with its officially tiny funding and almost no claimed legal budget, it
really would have been shut down a long time ago for legal expenses.
It's very clear that Wikipedia is a government-backed operation to the
highest degree, or otherwise the judges and lawyers would not be
keeping away from it.
But US lawyers "know" the game here - that's why they don't dare sue
Wikipedia to shut it down. They lawyers Wikipedia is backed by the CIA
and the government and the judges. The lawyers know they can end up
quickly disbarred, or with a bullet splattering their brains on the
sidewalk, if they dare to aggressively sue Wikipedia. So the US lawyers
stay away, just like they stay away from any proof of crime by judges.
In fact, Wikipedia is one of those
organizations that deserves to be sued and shut down immediately, it's
such a monstrous fraud and deception today, such an invitation to
government mind control in the future. Who knows the number of people
whom it has already slandered and harmed amid those 1-million-plus
CIA-backed Wikipedia web pages.
And it's all right there in Florida where the Bushes
can keep an eye on it.
Even just in general commercial terms, Wikipedia is a totally illegal
monopoly as well as a US-government backed fraud. It's keeping
legitimate providers of information from being more successful, as well
as supporting criminals tied to the US regime. - But US lawyers don't
dare to touch the Wikipedia monster, and the US judges won't let them
touch it. It's at the core of US "national security", the US attempt to
be dictator over the whole world.
very, very hard to contact Wikipedia, or even to figure out who to
contact or how to contact them. The CIA likes things that way. Attempts
were made to try to talk to Wikipedia for this article, but of course
the Wikipedia people didn't really want to chat about these things -
that's not how CIA guys like to play it.
Here's some contact
info for Wikipedia. To start with, an actual phone number! But press
inquiries only, they say. Even when you're doing journalism about them,
though, Wikipedia is likely to not reply to you, unless you are big
on good terms with US politicians.
High-level Wikipedia administrators who
have e-mailed hatred and abuse to Dr
Two of the very high-level Wikipedia administrators,
have e-mailed to Dr Les Sachs
their personal hatred and abuse. These two Wikipedia administrators are
David Gerard, official spokesman for Wikipedia in Great Britain - the
United Kingdom, and W. Guy Finley, a "Wikipedia Advocate" (a sort of
fake Wikipedia "lawyer").
David Gerard and W. Guy Finley have expressed
wishes to do personal malicious harm to Dr Sachs, and to use the
worldwide global media powers of Wikipedia to do so.
Both of these Wikipedia administrators, David Gerard, and W. Guy
Finley, have made clear their full support for the Jew-hating terrorist
crimes of President Bush's friend, the neo-Nazi Patricia Cornwell,
their support for Patricia Cornwell and Pearson plc operating a
media team posing as "Wikipedia users" to plant false and libellous
material against Dr Les Sachs
These Wikipedia administrators who have expressed their commitment to
using Wikipedia to present hostile and libellous planted "media
articles" to attack Dr Sachs, can be reached as follows:
Wikipedia Great Britain - UK spokesman, David Gerard:
Wikipedia "Advocate" pseudo-lawyer, "W. Guy
(Note the CIA-type front company name, 'Dynascope'.)
Wikipedia Leaders, Press Relations and
Wikipedia press phone number, 'Danny', no last name,
at Wikipedia headquarters in Bush-regime Florida:
+1 727 231 0101
Wikipedia "Founder", James "Jimbo" (Jimmy
"Dan Rosenthal - Wikimedia Foundation" <firstname.lastname@example.org>,
Wikipedia press and leadership contacts:
email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com,
firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org,
email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com,
Wikipedia "Advocate" pseudo-lawyer, W. Guy Finley:
Wikipedia e-mail addresses that will also likely ignore you unless you
are powerful and have good political or media connections:
Wikipedia libel "help desk" (ha!):
Wikimedia "support" team:
Wikipedia "information" team:
Wikipedia ignore-you-even-more team:
In a recent newsletter of the well-known Barry Chamish, he
gives the following address and phone numbers for contacting the Lords
of Wikipedia. Barry Chamish writes:
"Thank you Mr. Stockmann who traced down Wikipedia's address for all of
us. If you don't like my lying report or anybody's, and the inability
to change it, call:
role: Hostmaster Contact
address: Pipex Communications
address: The Hinshelwood Building
address: Edmund Halley Road
address: Oxford Science Park
address: OX4 4GB
address: United Kingdom
phone: +44 870 909 8181
fax-no: +44 1865 778 160"
Thank you, Barry
Also, one should list here the Wikipedia partners at
the US-Israeli Answers.com, who do not even
try to deny they are servicing US and Israeli intelligence agencies,
multiplying the power and effect of whatever political lies and fraud
are being portrayed on Wikipedia:
Max Riback of Answers.com:
POB 48253, The Tower
237 W. 35th Street, Suite 1101
New York, NY 10001
Fax: (646) 502-4778
Wikipedia & Answers.com as base to
deceive media, plant false information to cover Cornwell felony crimes